"Anyang's very wrong direction of aim." It started well, but it was "controversial to split sides."
"Anyang's very wrong direction of aim." It started well, but it was "controversial to split sides."
Blog Article
Nice catch. It is a modified combination of the English words nice, issue, and catch that was inspired by nice catch, which means "well caught." It can be interpreted as "caught a good issue." It focuses on issues that are drawing attention and takes a closer look. [Editor's note]
FC Anyang's aiming direction was very wrong. To be precise, it is the owner's emotional response.
Anyang held an emergency press conference on the 20th hosted by Choi Dae-ho, the mayor. It was to point out the referee's decision.
After the opening of this season, owner Choi Dae-ho also released a video related to the dubious decision toward Anyang.
The video included a scene claiming Anyang's foul in matches against Jeonbuk Hyundai, Pohang Steelers, FC Seoul, and Daegu FC.
Choi Dae-ho, the owner of the team, expressed his distrust of the K-League referee, saying, "It is outrageous that a wrong decision will lead to a decision. Such an objective, cold and transparent judgment should be made."
"It is a problem that must be addressed for the development of Korean soccer. We must point it out until we improve it. We need the courage to correct what is wrong," he continued.
On the possibility that the referee could retaliate through the press conference, he said, "Then I think we should leave the soccer world. This will be punished by the fans. We need to accept and supplement sound criticism."
This is a well-understood argument. K-League referees are closed to the public. Disciplinary action will be given to those who mention judgment at a press conference or in public after a match.
In particular, when there was a controversy over the judgment, a subcommittee on judgment evaluation was held in public. However, it was only a simple disciplinary action that was unconvincing to all the judges in charge, such as the existence of a judgment, the recognition of a misjudgment.
He did not show any action to take responsibility for the referee, including soft punishment. He often returned to the court when the situation calmed down.
Choi Dae-ho, the owner of the team, who brought up his conviction toward the K-League referee, suddenly changed his direction of aim.
Choi Dae-ho, the owner of the team, said, "There are about 40 provincial and provincial clubs. However, Korean soccer is all dominated by corporate teams. It needs to be improved," which is hard to understand.
"How hard are the municipal and provincial clubs that are run with taxpayers' money? We need to innovate the issue of making certain decisions while watching the faces of some corporate clubs. We must correct them."
It was a shocking remark that the referees were a little more favorable to the decision toward the corporate club than the provincial and provincial clubs.
In particular, it was incomprehensible that the team was biased toward emotion, saying, "Other civic teams will feel the same way. I will speak for you."
The unfounded remarks by Choi Dae-ho, the owner of the club, that "the decision is made while looking at the eyes of the corporate club" are controversial.
The argument that "the referee looks at the corporate team's eyes" is inconsistent, saying, "Anyang may have benefited." 안전놀이터
Choi Dae-ho, the owner of the club, had a good start to point out the problems of the referee. However, the direction of aiming was far wrong.
Everyone was united toward one goal, but it turned out that they were not on the same side. It was more unfair, creating an atmosphere of dissolution.